|
|
@@ -67,6 +67,16 @@ describe( 'IndentCommand', () => {
|
|
|
expect( command.isEnabled ).to.be.false;
|
|
|
} );
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ it( 'should be false if selection starts in first list item of top level list with different type than previous list', () => {
|
|
|
+ setData(
|
|
|
+ doc,
|
|
|
+ '<listItem indent="0" type="bulleted">a</listItem>' +
|
|
|
+ '<listItem indent="0" type="numbered">[]b</listItem>'
|
|
|
+ );
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ expect( command.isEnabled ).to.be.false;
|
|
|
+ } );
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
it( 'should be false if selection starts in a list item that has bigger indent than it\'s previous sibling', () => {
|
|
|
doc.enqueueChanges( () => {
|
|
|
doc.selection.collapse( root.getChild( 2 ) );
|
|
|
@@ -144,7 +154,7 @@ describe( 'IndentCommand', () => {
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
} );
|
|
|
|
|
|
- it( 'should fix list type when item is intended if needed', () => {
|
|
|
+ it( 'should fix list type when item is intended (if needed)', () => {
|
|
|
setData(
|
|
|
doc,
|
|
|
'<listItem indent="0" type="bulleted">a</listItem>' +
|
|
|
@@ -280,7 +290,7 @@ describe( 'IndentCommand', () => {
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
} );
|
|
|
|
|
|
- it( 'should fix list type when item is outdented if needed', () => {
|
|
|
+ it( 'should fix list type when item is outdented (if needed)', () => {
|
|
|
setData(
|
|
|
doc,
|
|
|
'<listItem indent="0" type="bulleted">a</listItem>' +
|
|
|
@@ -296,6 +306,25 @@ describe( 'IndentCommand', () => {
|
|
|
'<listItem indent="1" type="bulleted">c</listItem>'
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
} );
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ it( 'should fix list type when item is outdented to top level (if needed)', () => {
|
|
|
+ setData(
|
|
|
+ doc,
|
|
|
+ '<listItem indent="0" type="bulleted">a</listItem>' +
|
|
|
+ '<listItem indent="1" type="numbered">[]b</listItem>' +
|
|
|
+ '<listItem indent="0" type="numbered">c</listItem>'
|
|
|
+ );
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ command._doExecute();
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Another possible behaviour would be that "b" list item becomes first list item of a top level
|
|
|
+ // numbered list (so it does not change it's type) but it seems less correct from UX standpoint.
|
|
|
+ expect( getData( doc, { withoutSelection: true } ) ).to.equal(
|
|
|
+ '<listItem indent="0" type="bulleted">a</listItem>' +
|
|
|
+ '<listItem indent="0" type="bulleted">b</listItem>' +
|
|
|
+ '<listItem indent="0" type="numbered">c</listItem>'
|
|
|
+ );
|
|
|
+ } );
|
|
|
} );
|
|
|
} );
|
|
|
} );
|